Today's Scripture Reading (May 6, 2022): 2 Samuel 4
Voltaire, the French Enlightenment philosopher,
cynically noted that "It is forbidden to kill;
therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to
the sound of trumpets." It is something with which I struggle. I have
often described myself as a "reluctant pacifist." Reluctant because
there are situations where killing seems to be the only answer. What do you do
when a madman threatens the lives of tens, hundreds, thousands, or even
millions of people? Isn't it better to take the life of one guilty man than
allow him to take many innocents' lives? I understand the emotions of many
Ukrainians who right now would love to be in a position to take the life of the
Russian President, Vladimir Putin. And yet, I also see value in every life,
even in the life of Mr. Putin. Life is God-given and sacred, and I struggle
with our willingness to end it so swiftly. And because every life is valuable,
I am at heart a pacifist. I understand the contradiction and have decided to
live amid the paradox.
David seems to have held similar ideas. He was at war with
Ish-Bosheth and the tribe of Benjamin. I love the M*A*S*H definition of the
rules of war. According to the dramedy, rule number one of war is that in war,
men, or people, die. And rule number two is that doctors can't change rule
number one. There is truth in the observation. David was at war; therefore,
people under his command and the command of Ish-Bosheth were going to die. And
nothing was going to change the first rule of war. But for David, there was a
huge difference between killing a man on the battlefield and killing a man in
his bed. In David's mind, one was honorable and sometimes unavoidable, while
the other was murder, punishable by both the state and God. A soldier dying in
war, or as Voltaire argues, "in large numbers and to the sound of
trumpets," was an unavoidable part of war, as distasteful as that might
be. But the killing of a king at home in his bed was murder, even if it was the
king on the other side of the war. I think David would also have found the
killing of civilians to be unthinkable. His morality seemed to have a narrow
definition of when killing was allowable
David declared that the killing of Ish-Bosheth was a murder,
not a killing that was understandable in the midst of war. Of course, following
the dictates of an eye for an eye, killing someone who had participated in a
murder was also allowable. And so, the men who executed Ish-Bosheth in his bed
are executed by David's men. But beyond the execution of the murderers, the men
who murdered the son of Saul were further dishonored by having their bodies
hung by the Pool of Hebron. The head of Ish-Bosheth, which the men had brought
to David as proof of their crime, is buried honorably in the tomb of his
general, Abner, even though Ish-Bosheth had been David's enemy.
Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: 1 Chronicles 1
No comments:
Post a Comment