Wednesday, 22 July 2026

During Jehoiakim's reign, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon invaded the land, and Jehoiakim became his vassal for three years. But then he turned against Nebuchadnezzar and rebelled. – 2 Kings 24:1

Today's Scripture Reading (July 22, 2026): 2 Kings 24

Necho II reigned in Egypt during a particularly tumultuous time. The Babylonian Empire began its rise to prominence, and with the help of the Cimmerians, Scythians, and the Kingdom of Judah, it shattered the Assyrians' previous hold on the region. Necho wanted to maintain the status quo and avoid the chaos of an Empire-wide military struggle in the area, so he sent part of his army to help the Assyrians. Unfortunately, the army he had sent proved to be too small, but he learned his lesson quickly and attacked one more time, and this time he succeeded. It was this battle that would claim the life of Josiah, King of Judah.

Leaving a sizable army in the field to protect his assets, Necho returned home, and while passing through Judah, he noticed that the people had placed Jehoahaz, the son of Josiah, on the throne of Judah. But Necho wanted someone more amenable to Egypt's interests in the area. So he removed Jehoahaz from the throne and took him captive to Egypt. Jehoahaz would live out the rest of his days as a guest of Necho in Egypt. In his place, Necho placed Jehoahaz's brother Jehoiakim on the throne in Judah. Jehoiakim paid Egypt an annual tribute as the price of Judah's freedom, but, in effect, the nation paid for its alliance with Babylon by becoming a vassal state of Egypt.

But in 605 BCE, Nebuchadnezzar succeeded his ailing father as king of Babylon. And one of his first acts was to invade Judah, the vassal state of Egypt. Nebuchadnezzar defeated Judah and carried off the first installment of captives to Babylon, an exile which likely included Ezekiel, Daniel, and Daniel's friends: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. For the next three years, Judah would be a vassal state under Babylonian rule.

But in 601 BCE, two significant things happened. The first was that Nebuchadnezzar returned home, leaving a sizable army in Judah, but not his personal presence. The second event was Necho II of Egypt's final attempt at world conquest, beginning with Judah. Whether Jehoiakim recognized Necho's return as an opportunity to shake off the bonds of Babylon, or whether he was moved because his brother Jehoahaz was still a captive of Necho in Egypt, Jehoiakim rebelled against Babylon. But what Judah did not recognize was that Nebuchadnezzar's rise at this time in history was an act of God to get the people's attention. It was not really Nebuchadnezzar that Necho and Jehoiakim were struggling against; it was God. Judah's continued rebellion would only solidify Nebuchadnezzar's hold over the nation.

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Jeremiah 48

Tuesday, 21 July 2026

But if you tell me the dream and explain it, you will receive from me gifts and rewards and great honor. So tell me the dream and interpret it for me. – Daniel 2:6

Today's Scripture Reading (July 21, 2026): Daniel 2

Nostradamus was born in December 1503 in France. He is probably the best-known of the secular prophets. His prophecies, broken down into a series of quatrains, were published in three installments between 1555 and 1558. As was common for the day, no two editions of the prophecies were identical. Some have tried to describe the differences as a prophetic emphasis, but there is no indication that this is true. Nostradamus is thought by believers to have accurately predicted many of the events that have happened since the time of the writing of the prophecies until the present day. Supporters maintain that Nostradamus correctly predicted the Great Fire of London, the rise of Adolph Hitler, and the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center.   

But the thing about any prophecy is that the prophecies always make more sense in reverse. After the events have already happened, we can recognize patterns in the unexpected waves of time. But this is not really what readers of prophecies want. What the reader of the prophecy desires is to predict the future, but even biblical prophecies seldom do that. A case in point would be the birth, life, and death of Jesus. While Jesus, the Messiah or Christ, is predicted throughout the Old Testament, the fulfillment of those prophecies was not well understood, and no one really believed that the prophecies about the Christ would turn out as they did. We see the Messianic prophecies much more clearly in retrospect than the people would have before the events happened. And sometimes, while a prediction may seem to be accurate, critics will always question whether or not the correct prediction is any more than mere coincidence.

It would seem that Nebuchadnezzar was a critic when it came to the subject of prophecy. As a result, when Nebuchadnezzar has a dream that he needs interpreted, he fears that once his wise men learn the dream, they will just make up an interpretation of the prophecy. He actively questions how he could trust a prophecy given in that manner. And so, he comes up with a plan. If the wise men could tell him the dream, as well as tell him what the dream meant, maybe then he could trust the prophecy.

This requirement that the prophet reveal the dream and its interpretation was a new idea. It would seem that this was not the usual request of a king concerning the interpretations of their dream. But the reality was that the request was impossible, something Nebuchadnezzar's wise men understood. But the presentation of an impossible situation left an opening for God. And God was ready to move through that opening.

God still moves in the impossible if we will trust him and give him that chance to move.

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: 2 Kings 24

Monday, 20 July 2026

Please test your servants for ten days: Give us nothing but vegetables to eat and water to drink. – Daniel 1:12

Today's Scripture Reading (July 20, 2026): Daniel 1

Many well-known Christians, including Pastor Rick Warren, have advocated the health benefits of a vegetarian-style diet, citing the Book of Daniel as the model for the nutrition plan. These plans usually use Daniel's name in their branding and often promote Daniel's Diet as a biblically based diet guaranteed to promote health and weight loss. And there is no doubt that these plans do both of those things, but what isn't so clear is that the diet plans are biblically based.

The concept that these diets are biblical plans stems from this passage. The problem with saying that this vegetarian diet is biblically based is that we would have to take the passage out of context to make the argument. There is no place in this passage where Daniel announces that the vegetarian lifestyle (or even that a vegetarian purge or detox) is part of God's plan. The problem Daniel faced was that no suitable kosher meat was available. Most of the meat that would have come to the king's table would have been offered as a sacrifice to the gods of Babylon. That reason alone made the meat unsuitable for consumption by a good follower of Israel's God. Besides being sacrificed to the gods, it also would not have been prepared in a way that would remove all the meat's blood, a process that usually involved salting the meat to draw out moisture. This process is what makes the meat kosher. It was this lack of suitable meat that led Daniel to adopt a vegetarian diet; however, it was not because he believed in the health benefits of vegetarianism.

In fact, Daniel's story promotes an opposite lifestyle. The story holds that a meat diet was required for health, something that we now know is not true. This belief in the power of meat is the basis for the reaction of the handler of the Hebrew men. He was responsible for their health, and, as was understood at the time, that health demanded a high-meat diet.

The miracle of the story is that not only did the vegetarian diet work, but it also worked in a relatively short period of time. But the moral of the story is not about diet; it is about the four men's willingness to place their trust in God and do the unusual. The men's health was never attributed to the diet, but rather to the God they had served. Because Daniel and his friends trusted in God and kept God's laws, they passed the test. A strong belief in the God of Israel was the only reason that Daniel and his friends passed the test.

Trust in God is one of the major themes of Daniel. If we are willing to trust, then good things will happen. Life has never been about the physical realities that surround us. Life is about trusting in the God who created our physical realities. And no one else will do.

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Daniel 2

 

Sunday, 19 July 2026

… at the sound of the hooves of galloping steeds, at the noise of enemy chariots and the rumble of their wheels. Parents will not turn to help their children; their hands will hang limp. – Jeremiah 47:3

Today's Scripture Reading (July 19, 2026): Jeremiah 47

Rapid Dominance (also known as Shock and Awe) is a military doctrine developed by Harlan Ullman and James Wade in 1996. The doctrine advocates spectacular displays of force to paralyze the enemy and destroy their will to fight. Rapid Dominance was the military strategy used by the United States during the Iraq War, which might be appropriate because, although the doctrine was written in 1996, the Americans were not the first to use it in Iraq.

Long before the doctrine had a name, the same strategy was used in Iraq. When it was first used, Iraq was called Babylon, and instead of being used against them, the strategy of “Rapid Dominance” was used by them. It was used in the last years of the 7th century BCE, an era that Jeremiah knew very well. Jeremiah's warning is directed at the Philistine cities and concerns the “Shock and Awe” of Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonian war machine. Jeremiah says that the Philistines will not actually need to see the Babylonian army coming. All that will be needed to strike fear into the hearts of the Philistine people is the sound of the beat of the horses' hooves and the rattle of the wheels of the chariots that are carrying the military officers.

On that day, the fear would be debilitating. In fact, it would be so bad that people's natural behaviors would be disrupted. Rabbinical writings on this passage stress that the passage indicates that "the fathers shall not look back to have mercy on their children." In their fright, they will forget what is natural, and their fear will be so great that they will not be able to have pity and compassion on them. The only thing that will matter is their own safety and deliverance.

The Babylonian Empire did not last very long, but at its height, it struck fear into the known world. And the sound of their war machine was all it took to paralyze the ones that they rode against.   

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Daniel 1

 

 

Saturday, 18 July 2026

The LORD Almighty, the God of Israel, says: "I am about to bring punishment on Amon god of Thebes, on Pharaoh, on Egypt and her gods and her kings, and on those who rely on Pharaoh. – Jeremiah 46:25

Today's Scripture Reading (July 18, 2026): Jeremiah 46

Amun-Re was the chief god of the Egyptian pantheon. In fact, Amun became so all-encompassing in the Egyptian pantheon that he threatened to reduce their worship to a monotheistic faith. As time passed, Amun-Re was not only the king of the gods but was effectively becoming the only god of Egypt. In the Leiden hymns, a collection of Egyptian poetry written in the latter part of the 13th Century B.C.E., Amun-Re is hailed as the unity of all gods. He is the one god. He is the uncreated one, the one who existed before time began and will exist long after time has stopped. And if this is beginning to sound a little like the Christian God, the similarities continue. In Chapter 300, the poetry explicitly identifies Amun (the same as Amon in Jeremiah) as the primary god of the Egyptian Trinity. The god of unity, but embodying the powers of all three of Egypt's central gods. He is one – yet three. Specifically, the hymn reads –

            All the gods are three:
            Amun, Re and Ptah, without their seconds.
            His identity is hidden as Amun,
            He is Re as face, His body is Ptah.

            Everything that comes from His mouth,
            the gods are bound by it, according to what has been decreed.
            When a message is sent, it is for killing or for giving life.
            Life and death depend on Him for everyone,
            except for Him, Amun, together with Re, [and Ptah]: total, 3.

When we consider that Amun is the unseen God and is associated with the wind, the Leiden Hymns almost begin to read like the Gospel of John: " The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit" (John 3:8).

But Jeremiah makes it clear that Amun-Re, the uncreated one of Egypt, is not the uncreated one of Israel. Amon of Thebes, the king of the gods of Egypt, the prime deity of the Egyptian Trinity, the creator of everything, is nothing more than a pretender. And the God of Israel will never bow to a pretender.

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Jeremiah 47

Friday, 17 July 2026

You deceived me, LORD, and I was deceived; you overpowered me and prevailed. I am ridiculed all day long; everyone mocks me. – Jeremiah 20:7

Today's Scripture Reading (July 17, 2026): Jeremiah 20

In the late 1960's, Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice penned their conception of the last week of the life of Jesus Christ. "Jesus Christ, Superstar" has proven to be an enduring image, and the songs of the Rock Opera have carried the cries of the human side of Jesus to every generation since the opera was first written and performed. For me, one of the most moving scenes in the Webber-Rice tale takes place in the Garden of Gethsemane. It is there that Jesus is confronted with the cross on which he will die, there that Jesus strains against the will of God, wondering if all of this is worth it, and there that he wonders about the goal that they are trying to reach. It is in Gethsemane that Jesus wrestles with everything that is about to happen. Near the end of the prayer, Jesus finally gives in to his Father's plan. The words that Rice places in the mouth of Jesus at this moment are –

God, thy will is hard, but you hold every card.
I will drink your cup of poison.
Nail me to your cross and break me.
Bleed me, beat me, kill me, take me now.
Before I change my mind.

The sentiments of the words are only partially the product of Rice's imagination. The Gospel record does record that Jesus struggled with the path he was to take. But the reality is that, as much as some portions of the Christian Church seem to want us to believe otherwise, sometimes God's will is difficult. John the Baptist seemed to struggle at the end of his life, wondering if Jesus was really the one who was to come or whether they were waiting for someone else. And in this passage, it is Jeremiah who is questioning the will of God.

Specifically, Jeremiah's complaint goes back to the beginning of Jeremiah's prophetic writings. At the moment when Jeremiah was called, he had excused himself. He was too young, and he did not have the words that were needed for such a task. But in that moment God's reply to Jeremiah was "Do not say, 'I am too young.' You must go to everyone I send you to and say whatever I command you. Do not be afraid of them, for I am with you and will rescue you" (Jeremiah 1:7-8). But in this moment, years into the God mission he had accepted, Jeremiah is not sure that God is true to his word. He spoke the words that God had placed in his heart, yet it did not seem that God was with him or that God had been ready to rescue him.

But the story was not over, not yet. God still had further places to carry Jeremiah. But sometimes it is in the midst of the story that we stop feeling him. And that is why faith is so important for all of us, because with the eyes of faith, we know that God is with us. He is with us even in the moments when we question him the most.     

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Jeremiah 46

Thursday, 16 July 2026

Then break the jar while those who go with you are watching, and say to them, 'This is what the LORD Almighty says: I will smash this nation and this city just as this potter's jar is smashed and cannot be repaired. They will bury the dead in Topheth until there is no more room. – Jeremiah 19:10-11

Today's Scripture Reading (July 16, 2026): Jeremiah 19

One of our most-loved Nursery Rhymes was penned in the late 18th century. The rhyme in question is "Humpty, Dumpty," the famous egg who sat on the wall. One problem with our understanding of Humpty Dumpty is that the poem nowhere suggests that Humpty Dumpty was an egg. It is thought that the original intention of the rhyme was that it was supposed to be a riddle, a statement in which people would be invited to guess the identity of Humpty Dumpty. But the riddle long ago turned into a children's rhyme, and the mystery found at the core of the rhyme has long since been forgotten.

But that has not stopped some from trying to guess the riddle's answer. Suggested answers include King Richard III, the last king of the House of York, whom the upstart House of Tudor toppled. Two other possible answers to the riddle emerge from the Siege of Colchester in 1648, a battle from the middle of the English Civil War. During the war, the Royalist army found itself hemmed in at the walled city of Colchester.  Outside the walls were the Parliamentarians. The rhyme, some assert, is about either a sniper, a man known as One-Eyed Thompson, or a cannon, appropriately known as Humpty Dumpty, that sat on the walls of a church called Mary-at-the-Walls. The story tells of the Parliamentarians outside the city who weakened the wall beneath either the sniper or the cannon, causing the fall of "Humpty Dumpty." As a result of this fall, the city of Colchester was lost, and all the king's horses and all the king's men, referring of course to the Royalist Army trapped inside the city, couldn't save either the town or Humpty Dumpty.

God seems to have a similar illustration and story for Jeremiah to tell. Again, the weeping prophet is given an illustration of what is about to happen in Jerusalem. He is to go and take a jar and break it. The imagery here is not that Jeremiah would gently break the jar, leaving large pieces that might be put back together. The imagery is of a smashed jar that has been broken into so many pieces that it is impossible to reassemble, even with all of the king's horses and all the king's men at the ready to do the task.

But maybe the one thing we miss when we read this prophecy is that, while in the short term the prophecy was fulfilled and Jerusalem was left in ruins, God is still the God of the impossible, and in the long term it seems that God himself would put the city back together again. Jerusalem still stands today, although, admittedly, once again, it would seem that the Holy City is broken, divided among the People of Israel, the Followers of Jesus Christ, and the Followers of Islam. But no matter how broken the city might seem, God remains the God who can still put the pieces back together.

Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Jeremiah 20