Today’s Scripture Reading
(October 14, 2018): Leviticus 25
Lord Polonius offers his
guests this advice in “Hamlet;”
Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
This above all: to thine ownself be true …
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
This above all: to thine ownself be true …
(William
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 3)
The
advice in our culture seems antiquated. And yet there is truth in the words. Husbandry, a word not used much
in contemporary society, extends well beyond the agricultural meaning of “the
care, cultivation, and breeding of crops and animals.” It indicates the level
of control each of us has over the management and conservation of our resources.
In a world of easy borrowing, often at a very high-interest
rate, the need for the conservation of our resources seems to be often not
worth the effort. And so we sell ourselves away. The personal debt level in the
developed nations betrays that we have become accustomed of living on the money
we borrow rather than preparing for the emergencies that will inevitably come
through the conservation of our resources. It is a practice that can only end
in disaster. Part of being true to ourselves is living within our resources,
and conserving for the emergencies that are waiting just around the corner
On the international stage,
this problem of a lack of husbandry is exhibited
by a high level of foreign ownership and debt. Foreign ownership is considered,
at least by some, to be a significant problem within the developed nations. The
difficulty is revealed in that prices can
often be driven up by foreign investors so that the national investor can no
longer afford the commodity. A good example
of this is found in the housing market in
some North American cities. Foreign ownership of companies means that the
largest share of profit for that company is not being reinvested or spent
within the nation, but is being taken and invested somewhere else. And there is
a significant amount of influence that is wielded by these foreign investors
over domestic policies. And if we combine a high level of foreign ownership
with foreign debt, then we begin to lose control of our own governments.
This is the warning shot that is being sounded in some developed nations. The United States, as an example, in the
past has been very concerned about the amount of their debt held by China.
Combine China’s holding of debt with Chinese foreign ownership in the country, and we have the beginnings of a significant
problem of control within the nation. Each of us
are slaves to whoever it is that we owe money. And if the fear mongers
prediction of the national deficit of the United States reaching the yearly
level of 1 Trillion dollars is even remotely true, then in the future American
policy will be increasingly influenced by Beijing, no matter what the dance that
the government performs for the American citizens might imply.
The biblical answer to the
problem of debt was that it was simply was
outlawed. There was to be a fifty-year cycle, and every fifty years the land
was returned to its original owners. It was a reset on the economy of the
nation, and it made foreign ownership
illegal. No outside nation could own Israel. At best, they could be a renter of
space in the nation. The amount of the investment in Israel was shaped by the place the nation was in the
fifty-year cycle. Because at some point twice a century, your investment would be
lost as the land reverted back to the original owners.
In the end, it was only God who
could own Israel. And this was demanded by the law of God himself.
Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: Leviticus 26
No comments:
Post a Comment