Today's Scripture Reading (August 2, 2023): Jeremiah 50
As
I was reading some of the writings by Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon says that he
rejoices in the old Scotch writings on covenant. And then he refers to the
cottager's grace, a meal prayer prayed over the daily porridge. Spurgeon doesn't
try to repeat the prayer in the old Doric, a Scottish dialect in which the
prayer was initially prayed, but he gives us an English translation. "Lord, I
thank thee for the porridge, I thank thee for an appetite for the porridge, but
I thank thee most of all that I have a covenant right to the porridge"
(Charles Spurgeon). Spurgeon then challenges his readers; "Only think of
that, a covenant right to the porridge."
I must admit that as I
read Spurgeon's words, I accepted the challenge. But I am not sure I got even
close to what "a covenant right to the porridge" might mean. The
closest I can get is that if we follow God, he has promised to care for us.
Part of God's promise to us says that if we follow him, God will feed us, even
if it is just the daily porridge. And that is where I think we sometimes get a
little messed up. I remember an oil advertisement I watched on TV as a child.
The ad took a piece of bread and butter, asserting that the local economy could
supply the bread and butter of life. But the oil industry adds the jam, or
maybe the meat that lives between the buttered slices of bread. Maybe the old
Scottish grace reminds us that God will take care of our needs, although I
think there will still be times when we can't afford the jam. Maybe it is in
those moments that we thank God for our covenant right to the porridge or the
buttered bread. Too often, we demand more from God than he has promised. Not
that we will never have it, but much should remain a once-in-a-while treat in
our lives and not a daily necessity.
Jeremiah speaks of the
exiles returning home and starts by saying they will ask their way to Zion. I
am unsure how the original readers might have interpreted that, but reading the
words reminds me that many of the exiles who would return had never been there
before. They would be the children and the grandchildren, maybe even the great-grandchildren
of the people Nebuchadnezzar and his army had exiled.
But even more
importantly, the remnant that would return would be making a significant
sacrifice. The returning exiles would have to give up the nice things they
would have had in the Persian Empire. And they would depend on the covenant of
God for their needs as they returned home. They would trust in God and be
obedient in returning to Judah, but at the same time, they would need to rest
in the covenant, not that God would give them the desires of their hearts, but
that they had a covenant right to their porridge.
No comments:
Post a Comment