Today’s Scripture Reading (August 8, 2018): Genesis 48
Birth Order. To modern
ears, the words indicate the belief that
children maintain certain characteristics because of the order in which they
were born. And the reality is that there likely is a difference in the
personality of a child because of where in the order of their brothers and
sisters the child finds themselves. But the difference is unlikely to have a
mystical origin. It is likely a difference based on the way in which the child was raised. I recently had a conversation with
a couple of friends who were born a year apart. And the conversation focused on
the fact that there were albums of pictures taken of them. Their younger
brother who, according to the girls, was spoiled in the manner in which their
parents treated him, had fewer pictures taken of his childhood. He benefited
from his parent’s experience in raising children, although there seemed to be
less evidence of his childhood. It is not an uncommon phenomenon. The first
born is often lavished both with pictures
and mistakes. As parents, we often don’t know what we are doing when a child
first enters into our lives. Oh, we try to do research, and looking back some
of the research and ideas are laughable, but we don’t really know what it is that we are doing. We are pretenders on the
stage. But as time goes on, we gain experience and knowledge of our child, and
of our own abilities and deficits as a
parent. The oldest child is often the proving ground
and the ones who are born after reap the
benefit of our experience.
And while this was
likely true in ancient times as well, there was an added cultural
responsibility on the firstborn son. He had the weight of the family on him. He
received twice the allotment of any of his siblings because he would be
responsible both for the land and business of his father, as well as being the
one responsible for caring for the parents in their old age.
Except, it seems,
in the history of the biblical patriarchs. Abraham had two sons born to him
during the life of his wife, Sarah. The
oldest was Ishmael, born to Sarah’s servant Hagar. The youngest was Isaac, born
to Sarah. And while the boys genetically were from different mothers, the
reality was that, according to the custom of the day, both boys belonged to
Sarah. So, this being true, the double portion and the responsibility should
have gone to Ishmael. But instead, all of the inheritance from Abraham went to
Isaac.
Isaac and Rebekah
had two children; twin boys named Esau and Jacob. Esau was the oldest, and the
favorite of his father, while Jacob was the youngest and the favorite of his
mother. The blessing and the double portion should have gone to Esau, but,
through deception and manipulation, it went to Jacob.
Jacob, who was
called Israel, had twelve sons. The oldest of these sons was Reuben, born to him through Leah, who was
the mother of six of the sons of Jacob and the only daughter of Jacob that the Bible
mentions. The blessing should have gone to Reuben, but in every way, both
formally and informally, the blessing went to Joseph, who was the eleventh son
born to Jacob, although the first who was given birth to him from his favorite
wife, Rachel.
So maybe it is not
a surprise that the youngest son of Isaac desired to give a special blessing to
Ephraim, the youngest son of Joseph. After all, birth
order hadn’t meant much to his father and grandfather, and being the youngest
of two boys, Jacob probably had a special place in his heart for the youngest
of his grandsons born to his favorite, and eleventh born son, Joseph.
Tomorrow’s Scripture
Reading: Genesis 48
No comments:
Post a Comment