Today's Scripture Reading (March 7, 2021): Romans 5
American radio speaker and author
Earl Nightingale argued that "When
you judge others, you do not define them, you define yourself." In our
judgment, we try to shape the world around us, maybe even prove that we are
better than the one who is the object of ridicule. We use judgment to exclude
the one who is not like me. Somehow, we even seem to believe that exclusion is
part of what it means God followers in our culture.
What
we seem to miss is that Jesus worked hard against the exclusion of the people who
were subjected to religious judgment in his culture. He defends the woman,
caught in the act of adultery, by responding to the judgment of the men who
brought her to him by arguing that the one without sin should throw the first
stone (John 8:7). The men eventually realized that they had been excluded,
instead of the woman, and walked away. He told the parable of the Jewish man
who is robbed on the way to Jericho. He is rejected by a Priest and a Levite
before being rescued by a despised Samaritan, a man who was a victim himself of
Jewish judgment (Luke 10:25-37). Jesus
tells his followers that they are actually welcoming him when they welcome the
stranger (Matthew 25:34-40). Nowhere does he judge and exclude those who the
religious elite would seek to exclude. If there were anyone that he would judge,
it would be the religious elite. And in each case, it is not the one that the
elite judge that is the defining moment; it is the elite who dared to judge.
Paul
argues that this is a portion of what it means to be part of a Christ-centered
movement. God loved us so much that he sent his Son to die for us while we were
still sinners. God didn't wait for us to be worthy of his love or Christ's
sacrifice. While we were still sinners, he came to us and made a sacrifice on
our behalf.
The
problem is that we have become the modern-day Pharisees who believe that we can
shape and define our world with our judgments. I don't think that we understand
Paul's argument. If we did, I think our actions would be very different. Paul
is adamant that the Christian Church is the body of Christ. If that is true,
then we are the ones who should be willing to die for a world that is caught in
sin; we are defined not by our judgment but, instead, by our acceptance.
There
is currently a fight in many of our denominations over two issues that appear
to have become polar opposites. However, the relationship between the two
issues is not readily apparent. These issues are accepting LGBTQ+ Christians
into our fellowships and those who view the role of women in Christian ministry
to be subordinate to a male figure (complementarian instead of egalitarian
ministry roles). Both seem to want to exclude the other. According to some, we should
exclude both LGBTQ+ Christians as well as female Christian leaders. Those who
accept women in leadership are generally more willing to accept women in
leadership.
But
the argument here is not whether or not either of these issues is a sin. If we
are the body of Christ, why would we want to exclude either of these groups, regardless
of our view of what is right? Christ
died on a cross for our inclusion, even when we stood outside of the orthodox
Christian behavior. We need to continue the discussion around the acceptance of
women in leadership and LGBTQ+ Christians. I am not arguing either view here. But
our desire to exclude based on sin would seem to be anti-Christian. Because "while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" and for
our right to be included.
Tomorrow's Scripture Reading: Romans 6
No comments:
Post a Comment