Today’s Scripture Reading (December
6, 2012): 1 Samuel 14
One of the
questions that people seem to like to ask about the Bible is how can we believe
in something that is so full of errors. And the idea behind the question seems
to be that there are some very significant errors in the Bible that effect the
overall message of the Book. The problem is that that is not really the case. Are
there errors? Definitely! But we have found no errors that significantly change
God’s message to us. What we believe about Salvation, love, heaven and hell and
other key issues are consistent over all of the copies of the biblical books
that are still in existence. (And the Bible has more ancient copies of it than
any other ancient book in history. In fact, the Bible which was completed about
1900 years ago is better attested to and we have more ancient copies of it then
we have of the writings William Shakespeare written 400 years ago. We are surer
that the messages we find in the Bible reflect the intentions of the original
authors than we are that the message found in Othello carries the message and
intention of William Shakespeare.) Most of the errors are small errors in the
text – or even perceived errors because we have failed to understand the
original culture in which the document was written. But the errors do not
change in anyway the intended overall message of the Scriptures.
Having said
that, this verse seems to contain an error, and then the error is compounded by
an explanation. The error is in this comment about the Ark of God. The first
problem that we have is that there is absolutely no evidence that the Ark had
been removed from Kirjath-jearim where the Ark resided during this period of
time. The Ark had been there since the end of the days of Eli. And there is no
evidence that Israel had gone to pick it up, nor would they until the days when
David would become king and he would try to bring the Ark into Jerusalem –
making the City of David both the political and the religious center of Israel.
And if they had gone to Kirjath-jearim to get the Ark, there would be no reason
to take it back there for David to bring up later. The tabernacle, the place
where the Ark belonged, was in Shiloh during the days of Saul. The second
problem is that there is no reason for the Ark to be carried into battle
against the Philistines. That was how they lost the Ark – and the reason why
the Ark was in Kirjath-jearim – in the first place. And it appears that someone
in ancient times was looking at this text and realized that it did not really
make sense so they compounded the error by adding the statement that the Ark
was with the Israelites “at that time.”
We do have
an alternate reading to this verse, and it is one that does actually make
sense. The alternative reading is found in the Septuagint, a collection of the
Hebrew Scriptures translated into Greek just before the birth of Christ. The
Septuagint reads that it was ephod of the priest, or the priestly cape, that
Israel had with them on that day. The priest would often put on the ephod
whenever he inquired of God the path that needed to be taken. And that fits
clearly the context of this situation. Saul wanted to inquire of God, and the
priest was putting on the ephod and lifting up his hands to make the inquiry.
But, having
said all of that, the apparent error of the text in no way changes the intent
of the passage. It is still a story about Saul, a priest and the defeating of the
Philistines.
Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: 1
Samuel 15
Note: The VantagePoint Sermon "Temple Tantrum" from the Series "In the Hands of an Angry God." is now available on the VantagePoint Website - you can find it here.
Note: The VantagePoint Sermon "Temple Tantrum" from the Series "In the Hands of an Angry God." is now available on the VantagePoint Website - you can find it here.
No comments:
Post a Comment