Today's Scripture Reading (February 10, 2024): Luke 22
I
am a Baptist. My particular flavor of Baptist belief has separated from other
Baptists over the role of women in the church (there are probably other
reasons, but this is the one that seems to stand out the most.) Unlike some of
our closest Baptist relatives, we are egalitarian, which simply means that we
believe that anything a man can do, a woman can do (and all my female readers
are welcome to add the word "better" to the end of that statement.)
It is a big part of our identity, but that doesn't mean that we don't still
argue about it.
But
another part of our identity is a specific rebellion against the Roman Catholic
Church. When we celebrate the Lord's Supper, we stress that the bread symbolizes
Christ's body and that the wine (or, in our case, the grape juice) symbolizes
Christ's blood. It is a rebellion against the view of the Catholic Church
called transubstantiation. Transubstantiation states that the bread and the
wine used in the Lord's Supper actually change and become Christ's body and
blood during the celebration, even though, according to our senses, the bread
and the wine appear to remain unchanged. For the Baptist, this does not happen.
The bread and the wine symbolize Christ's body and blood. And sometimes, in celebrating
the ritual, we will downgrade this further by stressing that the bread and the
wine are "merely" a symbol. We don't want anyone to get any ideas
about what is happening as we celebrate around the table.
However,
I was reminded recently that that was not what the Bible says. The words of
Jesus recorded by his disciples say absolutely nothing about the bread and the
wine being "merely a symbol" of Christ's body and blood; they record
that, according to Jesus, he said, "this is my body" and "this
is my blood." This is a significant oversight for a religious group that
has many within its fold that hold to a literal understanding of the Bible. The
literal interpretation would seem to support transubstantiation. This leads me
to another conclusion: I am a Baptist, which also means that sometimes I am
wrong.
The
Roman Catholics and the Baptists are probably both wrong when we come to what
Jesus meant when he described the bread at the Last Supper as his body. Jesus
was perhaps looking back to something he had said much earlier in his ministry;
"54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will
raise them up at the last day. 55 For my
flesh is real food and my blood is real drink" (John 6:54-55). His meaning was never intended to be literal
(transubstantiation), nor was it meant to be "merely a symbol." The purpose
of Jesus's words was that those who would partake in the ritual of the Lord's
Supper must be willing to be fully committed to him (the political meaning of "eat
my flesh and drink my blood" in Jesus's day) and that these fully
committed followers would be raised up.
Every
time we share in the Lord's Supper ritual, we are not doing "merely"
anything. We are committing ourselves anew to the person of Jesus Christ. We
are indicating that we are fully committed to the cause and person of Jesus. We
affirm that nothing will stop us from doing his will here on earth. And that
purpose does not change depending on whether we call ourselves Catholics, Baptists,
or any other flavor of
Tomorrow's Scripture
Reading: John 13
See Also Matthew 26:22
No comments:
Post a Comment