Today’s
Scripture Reading (January 6, 2019): Joshua 10
The movie Braveheart (spoiler alert if you have not
watched the 1995 movie) ends with the death of William Wallace. The 2018
Netflix movie “The Outlaw King” basically continues the Scottish tale by
telling the story of what happens next. The historical William Wallace was executed on August 23, 1305. But that does
not end the tale of William Wallace. Wallace was
hung, but not killed. He was cut down early so that he would still be
alive when his bowels were removed from
his body. His intestines were then burned
in front of him. Wallace was then beheaded, and
his head was dipped in tar to preserve it so that it could be displayed on top of London Bridge. His body was cut into four sections and immediately sent
out to the four corners of the land. This kind of action was not unheard of in
ancient time and was often done as a
warning to any others who might be inclined to take up a revolution against the crown.
We don’t know how long the various parts of William
Wallace’s dead body were displayed, but we can assume that they were not removed quickly. Wallace’s tar dipped
head was on top of London Bridge for a relatively long period. We know this because on September 8, 1306, just over a year
after the execution of William Wallace, Wallace’s colleague and friend Simon
Fraser was executed and his head was dipped in tar and placed beside that of
William Wallace at the top of London Bridge.
Executing an enemy and then displaying the body was
not an unknown action in the ancient
world. It was a way of sending a message to your enemies. And that message, as
was true in the case of William Wallace and Simon Fraser, was “don’t rebel and
fight against us, because we will not react with mercy.” The intent was to
drive so much fear into the enemy so that they acquiesced to the demands of the
dominant party. And often the heads and bodies were left on display while the
flesh decayed off of the bones.
While Joshua executes the five kings and displays
their bodies on poles, by the norms of
the day, he refuses to leave the bodies on the poles past sundown. (Compare
this to the head of William Wallace displayed on London Bridge for more than a
year, and likely much longer.) Experts look at this and make the argument, as
they should, that Joshua was trying to keep the letter of the law. And it is
Deuteronomy contains this prohibition:
If
someone guilty of a capital offense is put
to death and their body is exposed on a pole, you must not leave the body hanging on the pole overnight. Be sure
to bury it that same day, because anyone who is
hung on a pole is under God’s curse. You must not desecrate the land the
Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance (Deuteronomy 21:22-23).
But
that brings us into a different argument. Some have argued that the Book of Deuteronomy
is actually of late origin, written or
compiled later in the monarchy, possibly during the reign of King Josiah (640
to 609 B.C.E.). But the instruction not to leave
the executed body of an enemy on display passed sundown is only found in
Deuteronomy, and Joshua seems to have knowledge of the instruction. All of which
supports the belief that Deuteronomy is of early origin, and that the book is
made up of the final sermons of Moses, something of which Joshua would have
been well aware.
Tomorrow’s
Scripture Reading: Joshua 11
No comments:
Post a Comment