Today’s Scripture Reading (November
3, 2014): Acts 7
Artapanus of
Alexandria, a Jewish historian who lived during the latter half of 3rd
Century B.C.E., argued for a very elevated of history of Moses. According to
Artapanus, Moses was highly educated and one of the authors of Egyptian
culture. Moses was credited with the building of cities and Artapanus argued
that it was Moses, and not the Egyptian folk hero Sesostris, that
was responsible for the administrative dividing of Egypt and as well as the successful
conquering of Ethiopia – and the latter he accomplished while commanding an
unskilled army. As a result of these
actions, Moses was the victim of jealousy from other officers. And it was as a
result of this jealousy that Moses was sent into exile.
Just over 200 years after Artapanus, Stephen provides his
own history of Moses. It is very probable that Stephen was aware of the writing
of Artapanus, and yet he refuses to follow all of Artapanus’ arguments.
Instead, Stephen is simply willing to argue that Moses was well educated within
the Egyptian system, which was the premier educational system of its day. But
he makes no other mention of the Artapanus history of Moses. But one place
where Stephen seems to depart from the Exodus account, an account that is
traditionally thought to have been written by or at the very least under the direct
observation of Moses himself, was in the area Moses powerful ability “in speech
and action.” Moses own evaluation of his abilities was significantly different.
Moses describes his abilities this way - “Pardon your servant, Lord. I have never been eloquent, neither in the
past nor since you have spoken to your servant. I am slow of speech and tongue”
(Exodus 4:10).
Yet, despite Moses objections, there is a logic in
Stephen’s view of history. As a boy being raised within the household of the
Pharaoh, a high level of education would have been an automatic right and
expectation, and that education would most likely include an early form of rhetoric,
or lessons centered on how to talk or have discourse with others. But one thing
that Moses, Stephen and Artapanus all seem to agree with is that Moses spent
time in exile. It might that Moses blamed his lack of ability to speak and act
as the reason why he went into exile – a cause that both Artapanus and Stephen
discounted.
The bottom line is that there is no real reason to doubt
Moses education – or his training in the art of conversation. But even though
Moses had both education and ability, he was still set aside for the middle
part of his life. The problem was that to accomplish the things of God, Moses
talent and education were simply not enough. And God would not end up calling
Moses and augmenting Moses’ education with his power – and his purpose - until
much later in his life. Without God, Moses human education was simply not
enough, leaving him feeling that he was “slow of speech and tongue.”
Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: Acts 8
No comments:
Post a Comment