Monday, 9 January 2017

A prophecy against Damascus: “See, Damascus will no longer be a city but will become a heap of ruins.” – Isaiah 17:1



Today’s Scripture Reading (January 9, 2017): Isaiah 17

The fate of Damascus throughout history has been one of a roller coaster ride of ups and downs. Sometimes, Damascus ruled, but there were other times when her importance significantly decreased, and she became just another city of the Levant. Most recently, Damascus’ role in Syria has been dwarfed by the role of Aleppo – another ancient urban center in Syria (Aleppo has probably been inhabited since 6,000 years before the time of Christ). It is Aleppo that was the largest of the Syrian cities for the past several centuries. But that was before the beginning of the Syrian Civil War. Today, Aleppo stands in ruins. We have no idea how many people still call the city home, but it is assumed that Damascus is now once again the largest city in Syria.

But Damascus knows Aleppo’s pain. Damascus is a few centuries older than Aleppo, and throughout her long history, she has known her own tears. She has been one of the most important cities in the area, and she has known what it was like to be considered unimportant. She has been considered the bright spot in the Levant, and she has been forgotten and thrown away.

As Isaiah utters this prophecy, Damascus is the cultural and religious center of the area. It was probably unimaginable that the city might disappear, or even ever be considered unimportant. Yet, in a few short years, the Assyrians would defeat the city and reduce her importance. And then, a few short years after the Assyrians takes control of the city; the Babylonians would defeat the Assyrians and assume responsibility for Damascus. Then the city would enter into a dark age about which we simply know nothing. Damascus, for a time, disappears from the pages of history. She would be rebuilt politically and would once again rise from the ashes to be a force in the Middle East, only to be defeated and considered unimportant once more. And this pattern would repeat itself over and over again.

Isaiah probably saw this time of defeat by the Assyrians and then darkness under the Babylonians as he makes this prophecy. Damascus has always been a city, but at this point in her history, and several other eras that would follow, Damascus would no longer be the city of importance that was worthy of her name. She would be less than the Damascus of history, story, and song.

Today, at least for this period, Damascus is once again on the rise. But only future historians will be able to tell us how long this time of importance will last for one of the ancient cities on our planet.

Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: Isaiah 18

Sunday, 8 January 2017

A prophecy against Moab: Ar in Moab is ruined, destroyed in a night! Kir in Moab is ruined, destroyed in a night! – Isaiah 15:1



Today’s Scripture Reading (January 8, 2017): Isaiah 15 & 16

The City of Al-Karak in Jordan has had a troubled history. We currently know it because of a Crusader Castle – The Kerak Castle - that exists there in the city. Al-Karak is eighty-seven miles south of Amman and placed on the top of a hill 3,300 feet above sea level overlooking the Dead Sea. The Crusaders used the city as a stronghold for forty-six years during the twelfth century before losing it to the Muslims in 1188. But then again, the transition of the town from one power to another is an ancient story in Al-Karak. It has been defeated and used as a defensive stronghold to strengthen the area since well before the time of Isaiah.

In Isaiah’s time, the area was held by Moab. We are not positive that this city is the Kir of Moab that Isaiah prophecies against, but that seems likely. If it is not, then, the city has definitely been renamed in honor of that Kir. And this stronghold has suffered the prophecy of Isaiah many times over in its history – several times the city has fallen in a night.

Moab, which is made up of people who were actually cousins to the people of Israel - the Moabites 
descended from Abraham’s nephew Lot - were continually at war with Israel. Isaiah’s anger and the sympathy that he seems to display for Moab probably exist because of that fact. But there may also be hints of an event that happened in Kir years earlier. It was the stronghold at Kir that the Moabite King ran to as his kingdom was falling around him under the joint attack of Judah, Israel, and Edom. As the king hid in Kir, he took his eldest son, the one destined to become king after him, and sacrificed him to the Moabite gods. The story is told in 2 Kings 3. And in this case, the sacrifice seems to have worked. The people were so angry, and possibly the armies of Judah and Israel were so stunned by the event, that the invaders were driven back and they left the land of Moab. But the sacrifice of the Prince at Kir proved to be a blood stain that was hard to remove from the psyche of the Moabites – something that Isaiah seems to understand here in this passage  

We are also not sure of the location of Ar. It seems plausible that this prophecy is actually about one city. Ar likely means city and Kir means stronghold. So Isaiah could be speaking of a single place – a city stronghold – and the ancient city of Al-Karak would fit that description.

Today, Al-Karak is made up of 75% Muslims and 25% Christians. This makes it one of the most Christian places in Jordan

Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: Isaiah 17

Saturday, 7 January 2017

How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! – Isaiah 14:12



Today’s Scripture Reading (January 7, 2016): Isaiah 14        
             
I have to admit that I enjoy watching Fox Television’s “Lucifer.” The show is another superhero comic book rendering of a hero; often comic book heroes are tormented beings which is definitely true in this case, helping mortals to try not to destroy themselves. In the case of Fox’s “Lucifer,” the main character is a nightclub owner who has escaped hell and is teaming up with a Los Angeles police officer in an effort to fight crime.

But every once in a while the question is raised about how “Lucifer” might compare with the biblical description of this fallen angel. And the truth is that it doesn’t. The whole show is nothing more that fantasy – it is about as true a story as Superman and his Kryptonian roots or Spiderman and his radioactive spider. The real Lucifer Morningstar just isn’t all that interesting. And he is not a tortured soul trying to do good, nor is he a Son of God, as the Fox show portrays him to be. If there is a comparison, it would be better to place the T.V. Lucifer in the realm of the Norse Gods and make him the son of Odin, although even the Loki character in the Norse epic has more mischief and Satan in him than the main character of the “Lucifer” television show.
Isaiah calls the King of Babylon, Lucifer, which quite literally translates into “morning star.” Unlike the television show, Lucifer’s primary purpose on earth seems to be to stir up trouble and make his power known among the lowly mortals, something at which, at least for a time, the King of Babylon excelled.

Isaiah’s King of Babylon is likely Nebuchadnezzar II. And again this is where Isaiah’s prophecy proves to be uncannily true. Prophesying a hundred years before the event, Isaiah effectively tells the story of the time that Nebuchadnezzar was brought low by God. According to Daniel, Nebuchadnezzar was walking one day admiring all that he had created in Babylon when God came to him and gave him this message.

“This is what is decreed for you, King Nebuchadnezzar: Your royal authority has been taken from you. You will be driven away from people and will live with the wild animals; you will eat grass like the ox. Seven times will pass by for you until you acknowledge that the Most High is sovereign over all kingdoms on earth and gives them to anyone he wishes.”

Immediately what had been said about Nebuchadnezzar was fulfilled (Daniel 4:31-33).

How far the king had fallen. Eventually, according to Daniel, Nebuchadnezzar acknowledged God and recovered from his fall. (It is important to note that the portrait Daniel paints of the Babylonian King is very different from any of the other authors in the Bible.) But as far as Lucifer Morningstar is concerned, his collapse will not have a happy ending. The Bible clearly states that, unlike Nebuchadnezzar II, he never recovers from his sin, and is cast into an eternal punishment because of his lack of repentance.

Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: Isaiah 15 & 16