Today's Scripture Reading (June 3, 2025): Psalm 34
The
name a Pope chooses often foreshadows the kind of Pope he wants to be. If you
want to know what things might be important to a new pope at the beginning of
his time as the Bishop of Rome, it truly is all in a name. So, what kind of
Pope does Leo XIV envision for himself? To find the answer to that question,
maybe all we have to do is look at what Leo XIII saw as important.
Leo
XIII (1878-1903) saw himself as the Pope who was concerned for the working
class. He wanted to right the wrongs that he believed had been visited on society
by the Industrial Revolution (c.1760-c.1840). Leo XIII spoke against taking
advantage of the poor. He wrote that not paying wages to workers was "a
great crime which cries to the avenging anger of Heaven." (Maybe those who
became rich by not paying those who worked for them should take special note.)
Pope Leo XIII also encouraged Labor unions as a weapon that protected the poor
from being persecuted, giving the poor a voice in economic policy.
Rev.
Art Purcaro, a friend of Leo XIV, also commented that the new Pope wanted to
continue Pope Francis's role in supporting social justice causes. This advancement
of these social issues is who Leo XIV wants to be and what he wants to
accomplish during his time as leader of the Roman Catholic Church.
David
called himself a poor man. He was a nobody who, according to the inscription
attached to the front of the Psalm, found himself in the presence of a
Philistine King and pretended to be insane. (Abimelek means "my father
reigns" and is a generic name given to all Philistine Kings.) In this
moment, David knew he had no power. David wasn't a king, not yet. Yet, he understood
that God protected him. I can't think of any better way of summing up the
passage than the way that Charles Spurgeon chose to summarise this passage.
Who was he (David [GM])? He was a
poor man — any poor man — nothing very particular about him, but he was poor —
a poor man. What did he do? He cried. That was the style of praying he adopted
— as a child cries — the natural expression of pain. Poor man, he did not know
how to pray a fine prayer, and he could not have preached you a sermon if you
had given him a bishop's salary for it; but he cried. He could do that. You do
not need to go to the Board School to learn how to cry. Any living child can
cry. This poor man cried. What came of it? "The Lord heard him." I do
not suppose anybody else did; or if they did, they laughed at it. But it did
not signify to him. The Lord heard him. And what came of that? He "saved
him out of all his troubles." Oh! Is there a poor man here tonight in
trouble! Had he not better copy the example of this other poor man? Let him cry
to the Lord about it. Let him come and bring his burdens before the great One
who hears poor men's prayers. And, no doubt, that poor man lived to tell the
same tale as he who wrote this verse. "This poor man cried, and the Lord
heard and saved him out of all his troubles."
God still hears the cries of any of
us willing to recognize that we are poor and stand in his presence in need of
Him (God).
Tomorrow's Scripture Reading:
Psalm 56
No comments:
Post a Comment