Today’s Scripture Reading (January 22,
2020): 2 Chronicles 28
Lewis Carroll asks the question in his 1865 classic “Alice’s
Adventures in Wonderland.” The puzzle, or riddle, is this; “Why is a raven like
a writing desk?” The book never gives us an answer to the riddle, and that became
one of the central mysteries of a book that is classified as part of the “nonsense
genre.” Because “Alice” is nonsense fiction, maybe the fact that the book asks
a question and then refuses to give us an answer should be expected. But it
wasn’t. The Mad Hatter’s riddle of a raven and a writing desk became the
subject of many letters written to the author during the last part of his life.
Finally, in the preface of the 1896 edition of the book, Carroll offers this
answer to the question.
Inquiries have been so often
addressed to me, as to whether any answer to the Hatter's riddle can be
imagined, that I may as well put on record here what seems to me to be a fairly
appropriate answer, "because it can produce a few notes, though they are
very flat; and it is nevar (sic) put with the wrong end in front!" This,
however, is merely an afterthought; the riddle as originally invented had no
answer at all.
I think that my
favorite answer to the Hatter’s Riddle was put forth by puzzle expert Sam Loyd.
He answers the Hatter’s riddle this way; "because the notes for which they
are noted are not noted for being musical notes.” But, maybe, when a question
is asked with no answer, then any response will do.
King Ahaz’s
guiding principle in life seems to be political expediency. Unlike his father
and grandfather, and even his son, Hezekiah, Ahaz has no grounding in the faith
of Israel. Gods only matter if they will support you in war and times of
distress. As a result, loyalty is a mysterious concept to Ahaz.
And so, the God of
Ahaz’s fathers sends trouble on the king. But Ahaz is so disconnected with the
faith that he cannot make sense of what is going on in his kingdom. In the mind
of Ahaz, what is intended to get the king's attention and to bring him to the
point of repentance, makes about as much sense as the Hatter’s riddle.
What does make
sense to Ahaz is that he was defeated by a nation that followed a different god.
So the answer to the riddle that was placed in front of him was to change his
allegiance from the God of Judah to the foreign god of Aram, likely the
pantheon of Mesopotamian gods including Haddad and Sin, as well as El, the
supreme god of Canaan, and other miscellaneous gods that they had picked up
along the way.
But the author of
Chronicles adds correctly that these gods were of no help to Ahaz and his kingdom.
The king had arrived at the wrong answer to the question posed about why he was
defeated; he exchanged the truth for a lie, and instead of salvation, the gods Ahaz
chose to follow brought about his downfall and the downfall of the people over
whom he was given responsibility.
Tomorrow’s
Scripture Reading: 2 Kings 16
No comments:
Post a Comment