Today’s Scripture Reading (April 4, 2018): Hebrews 5
If you have ever looked up into the sky
on a summer day and watched the clouds morph into recognizable shapes, then you have experienced the power of
the mind to fill in the blank spaces with what is recognizable. It is this
power that allows us to see Jesus or the Virgin Mary miraculously appear in a grilled cheese sandwich or a piece of
toast. It is also found in those situations when we think we know what someone
is thinking. Whether we are willing to admit it or not, we are often wrong, but
our mind powerfully fills in the spaces and creates order out of what is actually chaos. We do it everywhere we see an
incomplete picture. Our mind is continually filling in the blank spaces.
I have to admit that sometimes I wonder
about this process of filling in the blank spaces when it comes to the author
of Hebrews comparison between Jesus and Melchizedek. I mean, the actual story
in the Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible) encompasses three whole verses in Genesis 14.
Add in one more mention in Psalm 110, which is quoted by the author of Hebrews
here, and you have the entire library of what we know about Melchizedek from
the Tanakh.
For the author of Hebrews, I understand
that he is trying to make the connection between Melchizedek and Jesus because
they are the only two high priests that were not
descended from the Aaronic priesthood. Melchizedek predated the Aaron
and his priesthood by a few centuries, and Jesus was of the house of Judah
instead of the house of Levi and then Aaron. This
is the main argument of Judaism against the idea of Jesus being a priest. Jesus
was not of the priestly house, and he carried
out no priestly ministry in the temple during his time on earth. Therefore, he cannot be the high priest in
any way known to Judaism. The idea that Jesus is king has better ancestral
support than the idea that he was a priest.
But the author of Hebrews is tapping
into some other aspects of Judaism that would have been better known at the time he wrote this letter, but much more
obscure to the contemporary reader. For instance, in the Exaltation of
Melchizedek, a work that was written
around the time of Christ, Melchizedek is said to be born of a virgin during
the time of Noah and taken to the Garden of Eden where he was protected from the great flood, without
having to be on the Ark. The Dead Sea Scrolls include a text which claims that
Melchizedek was divine and that Hebrew titles such as Elohim, a Hebrew word
used to address God, belong to him. As Christians, we make the same claim,
arguing that titles like Elohim belong to Jesus. Taken together, we can
understand why the author of Hebrews decides to use the legend of Melchizedek
to describe the reality of Jesus. The Hebrews connection of Melchizedek and
Jesus is so much more than just a filling of the empty spaces in the story of
Melchizedek with human imagination. Hebrews
reads into the cultural story of Melchizedek to describe what had happened in Israel
during the life and ministry of Christ. In the process, Hebrews declares that
Jesus was a priest forever, not according to the Aaronic priesthood which was
only a priest for a time, but according to the legend of Melchizedek who was
believed in the cultural accounts to be a priest forever.
Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: Hebrews 6
No comments:
Post a Comment