Today’s Scripture Reading (January 17,
2016): 1 Samuel 8
In a Global
community it seems to be increasingly difficult to remove ourselves from international
conflicts. I think that there are really three reasons for this. The first is
that we have built friendships within the national community. It is hard to
imagine Britain under attack without, at the very least, the commonwealth
coming to her aid – even if the commonwealth ends in the next few decades.
There is still a connecting thread that exists between the nations. Israel for
most of Europe and North America is a protectorate – maybe because of our
Christian history, or because of the guilt that we feel for not doing enough
during World War II, but again there is a connection. And while there are many
good things about being connected, it can also lead us into conflict. The
second reason for international involvement is economic in nature. It is the
nagging question behind the American involvement in the first Iraq war – did the
American government intervene in Kuwait because of friendship, or because of
the economic realities of Kuwaiti oil falling into the hands of the Iraqi
government. While many people believe that they know the answer, the reality is
that we may never be able to answer that question to the satisfaction of
everyone. The third reason is because international conflict comes home too
easily. The Islamic States attack on France, or Al Qaeda’s 9/11 attacks on the
U.S. have proven that “a world away” isn’t exactly a long distance anymore.
But what is
consistent, and what causes the problems, is that we all have different
opinions about who should be our friends, or have different ideas about what is
economically necessary, or even about what to do to retaliate for attacks on
home soil. Those decisions are all left up to the King or whoever it is that
fulfills that place in our society. And we fight at the King’s wishes.
And maybe
that is what seems so incongruous about this statement of the people of Israel.
We want a King, like the other nations – one who will fight our battles. It seems
that even in antiquity, or maybe especially in antiquity, it is the reverse
that was true. The King did not fight our battles, we fought his.
What makes
this comment even more surprising is that it comes on the heels of a great win against
the Philistines in which God fulfilled the people’s idea of a King who fought
their battles. While
Samuel was sacrificing the burnt offering, the Philistines drew near to engage
Israel in battle. But that day the Lord thundered with loud thunder
against the Philistines and threw them into such a panic that they were routed
before the Israelites (1 Samuel 7:10). If what the people wanted was a King
who would fight their battles, then they already had him. But the concern was
more for a king who looked like other kings. And to get him, they were willing
to discard the God who was King and who was ready to fight their battles. They
would submit to a King who would have them fight his battles – and in this they
would finally fit in with the rest of the world.
Tomorrow’s Scripture Reading: 1
Samuel 9
No comments:
Post a Comment